Maui Fire
In modern discourse, where soundbites and sensationalism reign supreme, there exists a propensity to leap towards the most captivating narrative, regardless of its alignment with the facts. Such is the case with the recent fire raging on Maui, a tragedy whose origins have been (of course) ascribed to the towering specter of climate change.
The usual suspects, many driven by fervent environmentalism/secular religion, swiftly converged upon this catastrophe, pointing fingers at the abstract notion of global climatic shifts. A race to judgment ensued, sidestepping the more mundane and perhaps inconvenient avenues of investigation, conveniently skirting the rigors of scientific analysis, relegating other plausible causes to the shadows.
Beneath the sensationalism, more prosaic yet no less potent factors merit contemplation. Human negligence, often the harbinger of such disasters, must not be hastily dismissed. The Maui fire, a stark reminder of nature's capriciousness and humanity's fallibility, warrants inquiry. The race to anoint climate change as the culprit does a disservice to the complex question of causality. True understanding demands patience, investigation, and a willingness to sift through the ashes of bias.
GOP Race
As I survey the current landscape of the GOP presidential race, I can't help but feel a sense of both nostalgia and concern. The principles that once guided the Republican Party seem to have been cast aside in favor of a more divisive and populist approach, the approach I see most prominently in candidates DeSantis and Ramaswamy.
American conservatism was built upon a foundation of limited government, fiscal responsibility, and a strong national defense. It was a philosophy that recognized the importance of individual liberty and free markets, while also understanding the need for a robust and capable military to protect our nation's interests. The candidates vying for the GOP nomination should be measured against these timeless principles.
Unfortunately, the field appears to be dominated by personalities rather than policies. The rhetoric and focus on personal brand often overshadow substantive discussions about the role of government and the direction of our country. The ability to communicate conservative ideals with clarity and optimism seem to be lacking in the current crop of candidates.
Furthermore, the party's commitment to fiscal responsibility seems to have disappeared. This departure from conservative economic principles raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of their proposals and their commitment to responsible governance.
National security was a hallmark of Reagan conservatism, and a strong military was viewed as essential to both deterring aggression and ensuring peace through strength. However, the foreign policy discussions within the current GOP race often lack a coherent vision for America's role on the global stage. It is vital that a Reagan conservative assesses the candidates' ability to navigate complex international challenges and uphold a robust national defense. Front and center is the war in Ukraine, one that provides the US with an efficient and effective mechanism for hobbling our #2 strategic adversary without losing American lives. This is a no-brainer, but the lukewarm support/downright hostility to this effort among several of the candidates is disheartening.
Listening to Birds
Friends, let me regale you with the marvel that is the Merlin Birdsong Recognition Software, a true technological symphony for the ornithological world. This ingenious creation, a digital maestro of auditory revelation, allows even the most amateur of bird enthusiasts (yours truly among them) to dance to the tune of avian melodies.
Picture this: the sun's first rays paint the sky, and a dawn chorus commences. You and your trusty black labs begin the morning walk while the grass remains soaked with the morning dew. The air comes alive with a chorus of feathered virtuosos, each species composing a unique verse. Enter Merlin with its uncanny ability to decipher the language of our feathered companions. A mere snippet of a birdsong is all it needs – a few notes and Merlin conjures forth a plethora of possibilities, narrowing down the species with a magician's precision.
In this modern age, where one’s internal monologue often eclipses birdsong, Merlin's lyrical algorithms serve as a harmonious reminder of the beauty that surrounds us. It is a technological opus connecting us to the natural world.
Another excellent and thought-provoking column.
Speaking of the Republican Party, I get the impression that many people believe there's some group in charge who have (or had) a reasonably coherent conservative philosophy and could exercise significant influence on who wound up being the candidates as well as enforcing some basic level of party discipline to keep the wackos at bay. Having been involved in my local party organization for roughly 6 years, that's not at all what I saw. At best the party leadership can run to the front of the parade after the candidates are picked and their positions laid out as "Republican" doctrine.
As Niall Ferguson observed, the US has the weakest political parties of any major democracy. Thanks to the "reforms" of the late 70's to give more power to the "grass roots", the nominating process is driven by the very small minority who bother to show up, and those who show up are predominantly single-issue voters who never have volunteered for or donated to the party organization and never will. Many, usually the most vocal, are fixated on their champion, who may also be at the fringes of the Republican rank and file. It's very bass-ackwards. Moreover, the candidates raise the vast majority of their funding themselves while the district and state party organizations run on a pittance. It's got to be hard for a party "leader" to convince a candidate who's already won the nomination and raised or self-funded millions of dollars to toe the line. And, hard not to follow the golden rule - he who has the gold makes the rules.
I HATE the thought of having to choose between Trump and Biden. For either party to do better all it will take is for enough normal, thoughtful citizens to do a little research and show up at the caucuses or vote in the primaries and ensure we get better choices in November.
https://partner-mco-archive.s3.amazonaws.com/client_files/1547826612.pdf
DoD's 2019 climate assessment.
Setting aside what's causing it, setting aside the huge sums being spent helter-skelter to confront it, something is rapidly changing, and DoD budget set-asides for climate-related fixes are in the offing. For instance, National Guard soldiers increased wildfire-fighting hours by 12-fold in five years. The NNSY dry dock had 48 flooding incidents last year. DoD is talking about closing bases...using frequency of severe weather as a column in BRAC determinations.
Something is happening...